There are differences between chronologists when creating a chronology from the Bible. And there are both valid reasons and personal opinions for those differences. Here are some examples of some conflicting arguments:
- The genealogies of Genesis 5 and 11 contain gaps
- These genealogies can't be trusted since manuscripts contain differences
- The genealogies are only accurate if the son was born on the father's birthday
- The ages in genealogies are always when the first child was born, not the named son.
- There are different understandings as to the time spent in Egypt
- There is a missing individual in the genealogies based on Luke 3:36
- In establishing dates BC, there are disagreements over dates of fixed historical events
- Does "two years after the flood" mean after the beginning or after the end
- And so on...
- The Bible gives us enough information to provide that generally accurate chronology
- There are no grounds for supposing gaps in the Genesis genealogies
- The Masoretic text will be our text of choice, as opposed to the Septuagint (LXX) or the Samaritan Pentateuch. Most, if not all, of our Old Testament texts are based on the Masoretic Text
No comments:
Post a Comment